两种充气碟形囊体结构力学性能比较研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2021.06.006

现代防御技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 29-35.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2021.06.006

两种充气碟形囊体结构力学性能比较研究

张清南, 李昂, 陈晓岚, 范伯钧, 李佳欣

北京电子工程总体研究所,北京 100854

收稿日期:2021-04-22 修回日期:2021-07-14 发布日期:2022-01-12
作者简介:张清南(1989-),女,甘肃白银人。工程师,博士,主要从事飞行器结构设计与强度分析。通信地址:100854 北京市142信箱30分箱 E-mail:zhang_qingnan@ 126.com

Mechanical Performance Comparison of Two Types of Inflated Saucer-Shaped Airbag Structure

ZHANG Qing-nan, LI Ang, CHEN Xiao-lan, FAN Bo-jun, LI Jia-xin

Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineering,Beijing 100854,China

Received:2021-04-22 Revised:2021-07-14 Published:2022-01-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以平流层柔性充气囊体为研究对象,对分隔帘布式和高压气柱式2种不同内部结构的充气碟形囊体结构力学性能进行了研究。建立了基于膜单元和非线性接触算法的有限元模型,得到了2种构型囊体结构在相同压差及承载作用下的变形及应力分布,并通过试验结果的对比分析验证了仿真分析的准确性。研究结果显示,高压气柱式囊体结构在气柱表压较大时刚度更好且应力分布更均匀,能有效避免褶皱等失效模式。

关键词: 平流层飞艇, 充气碟形囊体, 力学性能, 压差, 褶皱

Abstract: In order to study the mechanical performance of the flexible inflated airship working in the stratospheric,two types of inflated saucer-shaped airbag structure,which are separate-curtain and high-pressure air-tube,are researched.A finite-element model for the airbag is established based on the membrane element and nonlinear contact algorithm.Based on this model,the deformation and stress distribution of two types of airbag under the same inflation pressure and load are analyzed and compared.The validity of the simulation analysis is verified by the comparative analysis of the experimental results.The results show that the high-pressure air-tube structure shows better rigidity and more uniform stress distribution with relatively higher inflation pressure of air-tube,which can effectively avoid the failure such as the membrane wrinkles.

Key words: stratospheric airship, inflated saucer-shaped airbag, mechanical performance, differential pressure, membrane wrinkles

中图分类号:

V274

张清南, 李昂, 陈晓岚, 范伯钧, 李佳欣. 两种充气碟形囊体结构力学性能比较研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(6): 29-35.

ZHANG Qing-nan, LI Ang, CHEN Xiao-lan, FAN Bo-jun, LI Jia-xin. Mechanical Performance Comparison of Two Types of Inflated Saucer-Shaped Airbag Structure[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2021, 49(6): 29-35.

参考文献

[1] REHMET M A,KROPELIN B H,EPPERLEIN F,et al.Recent Development on High Altitude Platforms[C]//The 3rd Int.Airship Convention and Exhibition in Fredrichshafen,Germany,2000.
[2] 刘建闽.平流层飞艇绕流场与膜结构大变形的耦合计算[D].上海:上海交通大学,2007.
LIU Jian-min.Coupling Computation of the Flow Field and the Large Deformation of Membrane Structure of Stratosphere Airships[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University,2007.
[3] LIAO Lin,PASTERNAK I.A Review of Airship Structural Research and Development[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences,2009,45(4):83-96.
[4] 高海健.大型平流层平台柔性飞艇结构分析理论与特性研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2010.
GAO Hai-jian.Structural Analysis Theory and Performance Research for Large Flexible Airship of Stratospheric Platform[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University,2010.
[5] 朱利君.充气囊体结构变形及应力的数值模拟分析研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2014.
ZHU Li-jun.Numerical Simulation Analysis on the Deformation and the Stress of Inflated Membrane Structure[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University,2014.
[6] 韩庆,乔梁,秦琪.一种联翼式平流层飞艇的总体设计[J].现代防御技术,2020,48(1):1-10.
HAN Qing,QIAO Liang,QIN Qi.Overall Design of a Joint Wing Stratospheric Airship[J].Modern Defense Technology,2020,48(1):1-10.
[7] 谭惠丰,王超,王长国.实现结构轻量化的新型平流层飞艇研究进展[J].航空学报,2010,31(2):257-264.
TAN Hui-feng,WANG Chao,WANG Chang-guo.Progress of New Type Stratospheric Airships for Realization of Lightweight[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Si-nica,2010,31(2):257-264.
[8] LI Bo,CAO Yan-ping,FENG Xiao-qiao,et al.Mechanics of Morphological Instabilities and Surface Wrinkling in Soft Materials:A Review[J].Soft Matter,2012,8(21):5728-5745.
[9] 兰澜.薄膜褶皱的宏观和微观机理与特性的研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2014.
LAN Lan.Researches on Macroscopic and Microscopic Mechanisms and Characteristics of Membrane Wrinkling[D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2014.
[10] 陈宇峰.大型柔性飞艇主气囊结构分析与模型试验验证[D].上海:上海交通大学,2015.
CHEN Yu-feng.Structural Analysis and Model Experimental Verification of Large Flexible Airship Envelope[D].Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University,2015.
[11] 杜星文,王长国,万志敏.空间薄膜结构的褶皱研究进展[J].力学进展,2006,36(2):187-199.
DU Xing-wen,WANG Chang-guo,WAN Zhi-min.Advances of the Study on Wrinkles of Space Membrane Structures[J].Advances in Mechanics,2006,36(2):187-199.
[12] 席俊波.飞艇囊体几何非线性有限元分析[D].西安:西北工业大学,2006.
XI Jun-bo.Finite Element Analysis on the Geometrical Nonlinearity of Airship[D].Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University,2006.
[13] 麻震宇,侯中喜,杨希祥.临近空间大型柔性充气囊体结构特性分析[J].国防科技大学学报,2015,37(4):25-30.
MA Zhen-yu,HOU Zhong-xi,YANG Xi-xiang.Structural Performance Analysis of Large-Scale Flexible Inflatable Structures for Stratospheric Airships[J].Journal of National University of Defense Technology,2015,37(4):25-30.
[14] 沈克利,陈永霖,徐文.压差和重力对充气膜结构变形的影响[J].低温建筑技术,2015(5):31-33.
SHEN Ke-li,CHEN Yong-lin,XU Wen.Influencing of Pressure and Gravity of the Deformation of Pneumatic Membrane Structure [J].Low Temperature Architecture Technology,2015(5):31-33.
[15] 陈宇峰,陈务军,何艳丽,等.柔性飞艇及其悬挂屏体系结构力学性能分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2014,35(7):826-832.
CHEN Yu-feng,CHEN Wu-jun,HE Yan-li,et al.Structural Performance Analysis of a Flexible Airship and Its Suspended Curtain[J].Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2014,35(7):826-832.
[16] 王飞,王伟志.半硬式与软式平流层飞艇结构静力性能比较[J].航天返回与遥感,2017,38(5):18-28.
WANG Fei,WANG Wei-zhi.Statics Performance Comparison Between Semi-Rigid and Non-Rigid Structure of Stratosphere Airship[J].Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing,2017,38(5):18-28.

两种充气碟形囊体结构力学性能比较研究

Mechanical Performance Comparison of Two Types of Inflated Saucer-Shaped Airbag Structure

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价