现代防御技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 19-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2018.05.04

• 空天防御体系与武器 • 上一篇    下一篇

导弹突防概率解析与仿真计算结果差异分析

胡振震, 王亮, 杨宝庆, 胡玉理, 杨文   

  1. 中国洛阳电子装备试验中心,河南 洛阳 471000
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-04 修回日期:2018-02-10 出版日期:2018-10-30 发布日期:2020-11-25
  • 作者简介:胡振震(1984-),男,浙江武义人。工程师,硕士,主要从事电子对抗研究。通信地址:471000 河南省洛阳市061信箱700号 E-mail:hzzmail@163.com

Analysis of Missile Penetration Probability Difference between Analytic Computation and Simulation Computation

HU Zhen-zhen, WANG Liang, YANG Bao-qing, HU Yu-li, YANG Wen   

  1. Luoyang Electronic Equipment Testing Center,Henan Luoyang 471000,China
  • Received:2017-06-04 Revised:2018-02-10 Online:2018-10-30 Published:2020-11-25

摘要: 建立了初、中、末各阶段统一的弹道导弹突防概率解析计算和蒙特卡罗仿真计算模型,分别计算了2种模型在攻击弹头数略饱和时(即识别出的攻击弹头数略大于拦截弹数) 给定算例的结果,并分析了两者差异产生的原因。结果表明:预警和拦截过程各环节的非独立性导致解析计算和仿真计算结果的差异,其中仿真计算模型能考虑到各环节的非独立性,更符合真实情况。

关键词: 弹道导弹, 突防概率, 解析计算, 仿真计算, 蒙特卡罗, 拦截过程

Abstract: The analytic and simulation computation methods with the same formula of boost, mid-course and terminal phases are established for the ballistic missile penetration probability. The given examples' results from both methods are computed on condition that the attack warheads are slightly over saturation (i.e. the number of attack warheads is slightly greater than number of interceptors), and the reason for the difference between the two methods is analyzed. Results indicate that procedure dependence between the warning and interception courses is the main cause, and the simulation method which has the ability to account the dependence problem is more close to the reality.

Key words: ballistic missile, penetration probability, analytic computation, simulation computation, Monte Carlo, interception course

中图分类号: