博弈论综合赋权的军用飞机作战适用性评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2018.01.028

现代防御技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 178-183.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2018.01.028

博弈论综合赋权的军用飞机作战适用性评价

李皆乔¹, 聂成龙¹, 邱华磊²

1.军械工程学院装备指挥与管理系,河北石家庄 050003;
2.中国人民解放军 65185部队,辽宁铁岭 112611

收稿日期:2017-05-03 修回日期:2017-05-26 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2020-11-25
作者简介:李皆乔(1992-),男,辽宁大连人。硕士生,研究方向装备综合保障理论与应用。通信地址:050003 河北省石家庄市新华区和平西路97号研1队

Evaluation of Military Aircraft Operational Suitability Based on Game Theory Combination Weighting

LI Jie-qiao¹, NIE Cheng-long¹, QIU Hua-lei²

1. Ordnance Engineering College,Equipment Command and Management Department,Hebei Shijiazhuang 050003,China;
2. PLA,No.65185 Troop,Liaoning Tieling 112611,China

Received:2017-05-03 Revised:2017-05-26 Online:2018-02-28 Published:2020-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为评价军用飞机使用阶段作战适用性水平,选取了6个一级参数,13个二级参数进行综合评价。为避免主、客观赋权法的缺陷,引入层次分析法与变异系数法分别确定主、客观权重,并引入博弈理论综合赋权,提高了参数权重的科学性,为军用飞机使用阶段作战适用性评价提供思路。

关键词: 军用飞机, 作战适用性, 层次分析法, 变异系数法, 博弈论, 组合赋权

Abstract: For evaluating the operational suitability of military aircraft in using stage, six first-level parameters and thirteen secondary level parameters are selected. To avoid the defects of the main and objective empowerment law, the analytic hierarchy process and the coefficient of variation are used to determine the main and objective weights. The game theory is used to combine empowerment, improve the scientificity of the parameters weight, and provide ideas to evaluate the operational suitability of military aircraft.

Key words: military aircraft, operational suitability, analytic hierarchy process(AHP), coefficient of variation method(CVM), game method, combination weights

中图分类号:

李皆乔, 聂成龙, 邱华磊. 博弈论综合赋权的军用飞机作战适用性评价[J]. 现代防御技术, 2018, 46(1): 178-183.

LI Jie-qiao, NIE Cheng-long, QIU Hua-lei. Evaluation of Military Aircraft Operational Suitability Based on Game Theory Combination Weighting[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(1): 178-183.

参考文献

[1] Steven W Pavick.Operational Safety,Suitability,and Effectiveness(OSS&E)Planning to Systems Engineering Plan(SEP)Gap Analysis[R].The Air Force Center for Systems Engineering at AFIT,2006.
[2] David B Young.Operational Suitability Test and Evaluation[R].The Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center,1991.
[3] J Michael Gilmore.Operational Test and Evaluation FY 2016 Annual Report[R].Director Operational Test and Evaluation Washington D C,2016.
[4] 曾天翔,魏子山,张宝珍.提高军用飞机作战适用性技术发展展望[J].国际航空,1995,13(1):15-18.
ZENG Tian-xiang,WEI Zi-shan,ZHANG Bao-zhen.Technical Prospect for Improving Military Aircraft’s Operational Suitability[J].International Aviation,1995,13(1):15-18.
[5] 余龙海,史贤俊.基于AHP-FCE的导弹装备测试性评估[J].测控技术,2015,36(12):122-126.
YU Hai-long,SHI Xian-jun.Testability Evaluation of Equipment Based on AHP-FCE[J].Measurement & Control Technology,2015,36(12):122-126.
[6] 王伟宇,朱连军.基于AHP-Fuzzy的装备保障指挥信息系统指挥控制效能评估[J].兵器装备工程学报,2016,37(10):66-71.
WANG Wei-yu,ZHU Lian-jun.Study of Command and Control Effectiveness Evaluation on Equipment Support Command Information System Based on AHP-Fuzzy[J].Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering,2016,37(10):66-71.
[7] 康云,李淳,戴振华.基于AHP和模糊理论的通信装备技术保障能力评估[J].兵工自动化,2015,34(10):89-91.
KANG Yun,LI Chun,DAI Zhen-hua.Communication Equipment Technical Support Capacity Evaluation Based on AHP and Fuzzy Theory[J].Ordnance Industry Automation,2015,34(10):89-91.
[8] 宋飞飞,郭建胜,李正欣.基于群组AHP法的装备维修保障能力模糊综合评估[J].火力与指挥控制,2012,37(9):63-66.
SONG Fei-fei,GUO Jian-sheng,LI Zheng-xin.Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the Maintenance Support Capability Based on Group AHP Method[J].Fire Control & Command Control,2012,37(9):63-66.
[9] 李爱民,张立君,曾治巍.基于改进型群层次分析法的装备维修过程模块质量评估方法研究[J].计算机测量与控制,2015,23(1):145-148.
LI Ai-min,ZHANG Li-jun,ZENG Zhi-wei.Research of Module Quality Evaluation Method for Equipment Maintenance Process Based on Improved Group AHP[J].Computer Measurement & Control,2015,23(1):145-148.
[10] 陈跃跃,刁俊良.基于组合赋权法的装备保障能力模糊综合评价[J].舰船电子工程,2010,30(11):140-143.
CHEN Yue-yue,DIAO Jun-liang.Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Combinatorial Weighting Method on Integrated Support Ability of Equipment[J].Ship Electronic Engineering,2010,30(11):140-143.
[11] 彭鹏菲,于钱,姜俊.多层模糊综合评判的装备保障效果评估方法[J].现代防御技术,2015,43(6):163-168.
PENG Peng-fei,YU Qian,JIANG Jun.Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Equipment Support Based on Multiple Fuzzy Levels Estimation[J].Modern Defence Technology,2015,43(6):163-168.
[12] 张毅,汪刘应,曹继平,等.基于模糊综合评判的装备维修效能评估[J].兵工自动化,2015,34(9):15-17.
ZHANG Yi,WANG Liu-ying,CAO Ji-ping,et al.Equipment Maintenance Effectiveness Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Criterion[J].Ordnance Industry Automation,2015,34(9):15-17.
[13] 陈丽,张朝元.基于变异系数法的聚类分析在汶川地震灾情分类中的应用[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2012,31(5):20-23.
CHEN Li,ZHANG Chao-yuan.The Application of Cluster Analysis Method Based on Variation Coefficient Method on Classification of Disaster in Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Journal of Luoyang Normal University,2012,31(5):20-23.
[14] 张林琳,陈礼高.一种军用飞机品质综合评估方法[J].兵器装备工程学报,2016,37(3):63-66.
ZHANG Lin-lin,CHEN li-Gao.A Method on Quality Comprehensive Evaluation for Military Aircraft[J].Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering,2016,37(3):63-66.
[15] 徐达,李闯,焦庆龙,等.基于主客观组合赋权的装甲装备维修性综合评价[J].装甲兵工程学院学报, 2014,28(6):18-22.
XU Da,LI Chuang,JIAO Qing-long,et al.Comprehensive Evaluation of Armored Equipment Maintainability Based on Subjective-Objective Combination Weighting[J].Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering,2014,28(6):18-22.
[16] 冯书顺,武强.基于AHP－变异系数法综合赋权的含水层富水性研究[J].煤炭工程, 2016,48(11):138-140.
FENG Shu-shun,WU Qiang.Research on Water-Richness of Aquifer Using Comprehensive Weight Method Based on AHP and Variation Coefficient[J].Coal Engineering,2016,48(11):138-140.
[17] 路遥,徐林荣,陈舒阳,等.基于博弈论组合赋权的泥石流危险度评价[J].灾害学,2014,29(1):194-120.
LU Yao,XU Lin-rong,CHEN Shu-yang,et al.Combined Weight Method Based on Game Theory for Debris Flow Hazard Risk Assessment[J].Journal of Catastrophology,2014,29(1):194-120.

博弈论综合赋权的军用飞机作战适用性评价

Evaluation of Military Aircraft Operational Suitability Based on Game Theory Combination Weighting

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李喆, 童逸琦, 夏文博, 应宇欣. 一种多源集中式空中目标类型综合识别方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(4): 53-62.
[2]	于勇政, 邵学辉, 高仕博, 蒲治伟, 薛冰. 多平台协同跟踪最优构型设计[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(3): 107-119.
[3]	杨鑫, 许卫东, 刘朝畅, 贾其, 郝有斌. 基于AHP和集对分析的自适应伪装系统综合评级[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(2): 109-118.
[4]	李迎博, 谭黎立, 王凯旋, 梁卓, 潘彦鹏. 一种基于构件重要度的软件可靠性评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(6): 103-109.
[5]	翟芸, 胡冰, 施端阳. 基于改进AHP-熵权法的雷达装备可靠性评估指标赋权方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 148-155.
[6]	李威, 卢盈齐. 基于聚类组合赋权的空袭目标威胁评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(3): 17-24.
[7]	张馨予, 胡冰, 张逸楠, 边志芸. 基于改进Grey-AHP的雷达装备维修性评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(5): 78-87.
[8]	马特, 郑致远, 赵军虎. 分布式多无人机编队控制与博弈算法研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(5): 45-50.
[9]	姚恺, 黄少罗, 王晋生, 刘月河. 基于优化AHP的远火模拟训练成绩自主评定方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(4): 99-106.
[10]	李海君, 徐廷学. 基于组合赋权-改进灰色关联的导弹状态评估决策[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(4): 91-98.
[11]	杨剑波, 宗思光. 基于模糊-ADC的反舰导弹武器系统效能评估方法研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2021, 49(3): 55-62.
[12]	王慕鸿, 徐瑜, 陈国生. 两栖攻击舰对空自防御作战目标威胁评估研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(6): 67-73.
[13]	汪浩. 基于OODA的舰艇编队防空体系作战效能评估研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(6): 19-25.
[14]	高雅娟, 马涛, 武红姣. 试飞阶段军用飞机任务可靠性增长建模及评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(5): 92-96.
[15]	姜天娇, 范秀英, 黄新宇. 改进层次分析法在侦察设备规划中的应用[J]. 现代防御技术, 2018, 46(5): 62-68.