Modern Defense Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 146-154.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2023.06.017
• INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles
Tao GAO1,2, Yingjun ZHAO1, Tong HUANG2
Received:
2023-06-14
Revised:
2023-10-07
Online:
2023-12-28
Published:
2023-12-29
作者简介:
高涛(1990-),男,四川冕宁人。硕士生,研究方向为维修保障技术研究。
CLC Number:
Tao GAO, Yingjun ZHAO, Tong HUANG. Evaluation Method of Equipment Maintenance Support Capability Based on Improved PSR Theory[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(6): 146-154.
高涛, 赵英俊, 黄通. 基于改进PSR理论的装备维修保障能力评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(6): 146-154.
准则层 | 指标层 | 指标含义 | |
---|---|---|---|
压力P | 故障评定属性 | 故障采集与检测度P1 | 即时对故障信息的采集和检测时间 |
军用维修信息系统完整度P2 | 军用维修信息系统对装备故障类型和故障等级评定的时间 | ||
地方维修信息系统关联度P3 | 与地方维修信息系统的关联时间 | ||
地方维修信息系统完整度P4 | 地方维修信息系统对装备故障类型和故障等级评定的时间 | ||
状态S | 备件保障属性 | 军用备件完整度S1 | 军用维修保障系统的备件占比率 |
地方备件关联度S2 | 与地方维修备件系统的关联比率 | ||
地方备件完整度S3 | 地方维修保障系统的备件占比率 | ||
军地调配协调度S4 | 军地组织调配的协调效率 | ||
装备部件军地通用度S5 | 装备在部件上的军地通用比率 | ||
军用维修设备满足度S6 | 军用维修设备编配的完整比率 | ||
地方维修设备关联度S7 | 地方维修设备的关联比率 | ||
地方维修设备满足度S8 | 地方维修设备编配的完整比率 | ||
响应R | 故障维修属性 | 军用维修支援快速度R1 | 军用维修支援到位的时间 |
地方维修支援快速度R2 | 地方维修支援到位的时间 | ||
军用维修快速度R3 | 军用维修成功的时间 | ||
地方维修快速度R4 | 地方维修成功的时间 |
Table 1 Evaluation index system for maintenance support capability of military-civilian integrated equipment
准则层 | 指标层 | 指标含义 | |
---|---|---|---|
压力P | 故障评定属性 | 故障采集与检测度P1 | 即时对故障信息的采集和检测时间 |
军用维修信息系统完整度P2 | 军用维修信息系统对装备故障类型和故障等级评定的时间 | ||
地方维修信息系统关联度P3 | 与地方维修信息系统的关联时间 | ||
地方维修信息系统完整度P4 | 地方维修信息系统对装备故障类型和故障等级评定的时间 | ||
状态S | 备件保障属性 | 军用备件完整度S1 | 军用维修保障系统的备件占比率 |
地方备件关联度S2 | 与地方维修备件系统的关联比率 | ||
地方备件完整度S3 | 地方维修保障系统的备件占比率 | ||
军地调配协调度S4 | 军地组织调配的协调效率 | ||
装备部件军地通用度S5 | 装备在部件上的军地通用比率 | ||
军用维修设备满足度S6 | 军用维修设备编配的完整比率 | ||
地方维修设备关联度S7 | 地方维修设备的关联比率 | ||
地方维修设备满足度S8 | 地方维修设备编配的完整比率 | ||
响应R | 故障维修属性 | 军用维修支援快速度R1 | 军用维修支援到位的时间 |
地方维修支援快速度R2 | 地方维修支援到位的时间 | ||
军用维修快速度R3 | 军用维修成功的时间 | ||
地方维修快速度R4 | 地方维修成功的时间 |
项目 | 节点数 | 边数 | 平均度 | 聚类系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
数值 | 19 | 26 | 2.786 | 0.177 4 |
Table 2 Basic network feature parameters
项目 | 节点数 | 边数 | 平均度 | 聚类系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
数值 | 19 | 26 | 2.786 | 0.177 4 |
节点 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
权重 | 0.032 7 | 0.017 7 | 0.023 8 | 0.014 2 | 0.097 1 | 0.065 5 | 0.055 9 | 0.111 5 |
节点 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
权重 | 0.119 7 | 0.097 1 | 0.065 5 | 0.055 9 | 0.084 1 | 0.056 0 | 0.070 8 | 0.032 5 |
Table 3 Mutual information value and normalized weight value of index node
节点 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
权重 | 0.032 7 | 0.017 7 | 0.023 8 | 0.014 2 | 0.097 1 | 0.065 5 | 0.055 9 | 0.111 5 |
节点 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
权重 | 0.119 7 | 0.097 1 | 0.065 5 | 0.055 9 | 0.084 1 | 0.056 0 | 0.070 8 | 0.032 5 |
项目 | 试验评分 | 量纲 |
---|---|---|
P1 | 62 s | T |
P2 | 196 s | T |
P3 | 349 s | T |
P4 | 127 s | T |
S1 | 100% | - |
S2 | 37% | - |
S3 | 46% | - |
S4 | 25% | - |
S5 | 65% | - |
S6 | 100% | - |
S7 | 12% | - |
S8 | 35% | - |
R1 | 1 073 s | T |
R2 | 566 s | T |
R3 | 1 597 s | T |
R4 | 2 071 s | T |
Table 4 Equipment maintenance test score and index dimension comparison
项目 | 试验评分 | 量纲 |
---|---|---|
P1 | 62 s | T |
P2 | 196 s | T |
P3 | 349 s | T |
P4 | 127 s | T |
S1 | 100% | - |
S2 | 37% | - |
S3 | 46% | - |
S4 | 25% | - |
S5 | 65% | - |
S6 | 100% | - |
S7 | 12% | - |
S8 | 35% | - |
R1 | 1 073 s | T |
R2 | 566 s | T |
R3 | 1 597 s | T |
R4 | 2 071 s | T |
1 | 祝东攀, 曹继平, 毕杰. 基于多目标问题的装备维修保障资源调度研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(2):119-126. |
ZHU Dongpan, CAO Jiping, BI Jie. Scheduling of Equipment Maintenance and Support Resources Based on Multi-objective problem [J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2023, 51(2):119-126. | |
2 | 何鹏, 王晖, 黎云兵, 等. 军民融合陆军装备维修保障体系能力评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2021, 46(11):73-81. |
HE Peng, WANG Hui, LI Yunbing, et al. Research on Capability Evaluation of Military Civilian Integration Army Equipment Maintenance Support System[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2021, 46(11):73-81. | |
3 | 王双川, 贾希胜, 胡起伟, 等. 合成旅装备维修保障效能评估的理论框架[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45(8):9-15. |
WANG Shuangchuan, JIA Xisheng, HU Qiwei, et al. A Theoretical Framework for Equipment Maintenance Support Effectiveness Evaluation of Synthetic Brigade[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2020, 45(8):9-15. | |
4 | 王蕾, 林涛. 新时期下装备维修保障模式研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(5):86-91,104. |
WANG Lei, LIN Tao. Research on Equipment Maintenance Support Mode in the New Period [J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2020, 48(5):86-91,104. | |
5 | 朱敦祥, 史宪铭, 荣丽卿, 等. 云物元的军民融合装备维修保障能力评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2019, 47(2):130-136. |
ZHU Dunxiang, SHI Xianming. RONG Liqing,et al. Evaluation of Maintenance Support Capability of Military and Civilian Integrated Equipment Based on Cloud Objects[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2019, 47 (2):130-136. | |
6 | 舒正平, 李忠光, 张永东, 等. 装备维修军民融合保障体系建设基本问题研究[J]. 装备学院学报, 2016, 27(1):6-10. |
SHU Zhengping, LI Zhongguang, ZHANG Yongdong, et al. Basic Issues About Civil-Military Integration Support System of Equipment Maintenance[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2016, 27(1):6-10. | |
7 | 杨懿, 武昌, 刘涵, 等. 基于分形思想的维修保障系统效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2007, 32(9):69-72. |
YANG Yi, WU Chang, LIU Han, et al. Study of Effectiveness Evaluation of Maintenance Support System Based on Fractal Conception[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2007, 32(9):69-72. | |
8 | 杨超, 陈小卫, 王超, 等. 航天试验部队训练装备备件军地联合库存建模研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(1):145-154. |
YANG Chao, CHEN Xiaowei, WANG Chao, et al. Modeling of Civil-Military Joint Inventory of Spare Parts for Training Equipment of Space Test Force [J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2023, 51(1):145-154. | |
9 | 郭金茂, 尹瀚泽, 徐玉国. 装备维修保障能力评估指标模糊聚类分析[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2020, 41(10):76-80. |
GUO Jinmao, YIN Hanze, XU Yuguo. Fuzzy Cluster Analysis of Assessment Index of Equipment Maintenance Support Ability[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2020, 41(10):76-80. | |
10 | YANG Fengyuan, LI Zhijie, ZHUANG Zhuo, et al. Evaluating the Blast Mitigation Performance of Hard/Soft Composite Structures Through Field Explosion Experiment and Numerical Analysis[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2022, 38(1):27-36. |
11 | ZHOU Shijie. Research on Safety Evaluation of Nuclear Power Plant Based on Entropy Weight Method[J]. Canadian Social Science, 2021, 17(4):82-91. |
12 | 刘炳琪, 胡剑波, 李俊. 基于云模型的航空装备维修保障能力评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45(3):138-143. |
LIU Bingqi, HU Jianbo, LI Jun. Evaluation of Aviation Equipment Maintenance Support Capability Based on Cloud Model[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2020, 45(3):138-143. | |
13 | 戈洪宇, 李皆乔, 刘益东, 等. 某型车载炮作战试验维修保障效能评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 42(2):122-126. |
GE Hongyu, LI Jieqiao, LIU Yidong, et al. Truck-Mounted Howitzer Maintenance Effectiveness Evaluation in Operational Test[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2021, 42(2):122-126. | |
14 | YAO Tianle, MIAO Run, WANG Weili, et al. Synthetic Damage Effect Assessment Through Evidential Reasoning Approach and Neural Fuzzy Inference: Application in Ship Target[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(8):143-157. |
15 | BI Wenhao, GAO Fei, ZHANG An. A Novel Weapon System Effectiveness Assessment Method Based on the Interval-Valued Evidential Reasoning Algorithm and the Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021,9: 53480-53490. |
16 | 郏鹏鑫, 杨博, 王红瑞, 等. 长江经济带产业绿色发展等级评估[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39 (1):142-149. |
JIA Pengxin, YANG Bo, WANG Hongrui, et al. Evaluation of Industrial Green Development Level in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39 (1):142-149. | |
17 | 马润年, 王班, 王刚, 等. 基于互信息的通信网络节点重要性度量方法[J]. 电子学报, 2017, 45 (3):747-752. |
MA Runnian, WANG Ban, WANG Gang, et al. Evaluation Method for Node Importance in Communication Network Based on Mutual Information[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2017, 45 (3):747-752. |
[1] | Yaolong ZHANG, Yongjun RUAN, Luhao ZHAO, Yisong HUANG, Yurong GUO. Research on Equipment Support Capability Evaluation Method of Synthetic Brigade Based on Extension Cloud [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(1): 86-95. |
[2] | LI Hai-jun, XU Ting-xue. Missile Condition Evaluation and Decision Based on Improved Grey Relational Analysis with Combination Weighting [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2021, 49(4): 91-98. |
[3] | XU Qiang, JIN Zhen-zhong, YANG Ji-kun. Research on Establishment Method of Evaluation Index System for Operational Test of Warships [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2021, 49(3): 47-54. |
[4] | ZHANG Cheng-long, TANG Ming-nan, LI Lin-lin. Equipment Operational Requirement Generation Method Based on War Design [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2020, 48(3): 24-30. |
[5] | SHI Duan-yang, HU Bing, CHEN Jia-xun, DONG Xing-yang. Supportability Evaluation Model of Radar Equipment Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2020, 48(1): 89-94. |
[6] | CHEN Jia-xi, YUAN Yan-bin, YUE Xiao-rui. Surface-to-Air Missiles′ Depot Maintenance and Support Capability Evaluation Based on Contractor [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2020, 48(1): 74-79. |
[7] | CHENG Yang, HU Bing, DONG Wei. Supportability Evaluation of Radar Equipment Based on SPA-AHM [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(6): 115-121. |
[8] | WANG Jin-song, WANG Xiao-chao, LI Shi-kai. Effectiveness Evaluation of Cyberspace Information Defense Combat Command [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(5): 143-151. |
[9] | JIANG Tian-jiao, FAN Xiu-ying, HUANG Xin-yu. Application of Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process in Reconnaissance Equipment Planning [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(5): 62-68. |
[10] | YANG Xue, DONG Ai, ZHAO Wen-ting, ZOU Xiao-jian. System Contribution Rate of the Antiaircraft Missile Weapon [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(3): 1-8. |
[11] | LI Guo-jing, ZHOU Chi, QIN Guo-ling. Anti-Interference Efficiency Evaluation and Optimal Selection of Hybrid Spread Spectrum TT&C System [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(1): 19-26. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 103
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 151
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||