改进突变级数法的雷达装备保障性评估模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2020.01.014

现代防御技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 89-94.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2020.01.014

改进突变级数法的雷达装备保障性评估模型

施端阳^1,2, 胡冰¹, 陈嘉勋¹, 董兴阳³

1.空军预警学院,湖北武汉 430019;
2.中国人民解放军95174部队,湖北武汉 430040;
3.中国人民解放军95910部队,甘肃酒泉 735000

收稿日期:2019-04-18 修回日期:2019-06-27 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2021-01-20
作者简介:施端阳(1992-),男,湖北枝江人。硕士生,主要从事预警装备管理与保障研究。通信地址:430019 湖北省武汉市江岸区黄浦大街288号 E-mail:644481846@qq.com
基金资助:
全军军事类研究生资助课题(DSSQ910262018005)

Supportability Evaluation Model of Radar Equipment Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method

SHI Duan-yang^1,2, HU Bing¹, CHEN Jia-xun¹, DONG Xing-yang³

1. Air Force Early Warning Academy,Hubei Wuhan 430019,China;
2. PLA,No.95174 Troop,Hubei Wuhan 430040,China;
3. PLA,No.95910 Troop,Gansu Jiuquan 735000,China

Received:2019-04-18 Revised:2019-06-27 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2021-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对雷达装备保障性的影响因素繁多,且具有层次性的问题,根据雷达装备保障性的要求,构建了雷达装备保障性评估指标体系。采用综合调整法对初始综合值进行调整,以改进突变级数法中综合评估值整体接近于1的问题,从而更直观地反映评估值的大小与等级。设计了基于改进突变级数法的雷达装备保障性评估模型,通过实例表明该方法能科学、有效地评估雷达装备的保障性等级。

关键词: 突变级数法, 雷达装备, 保障性, 评估, 指标体系, 归一公式

Abstract: In view of the factors affecting the supportability of radar equipment are numerous and hierarchical, according to the requirement of radar equipment supportability, an index system of supportability evaluation of radar equipment is constructed. The comprehensive adjustment method is used to adjust the initial comprehensive value, so as to improve the problem that the overall comprehensive evaluation value in the catastrophe progression method is close to one, thus more intuitively reflect the size and level of the evaluation value. A supportability evaluation model of radar equipment based on improved catastrophe progression method is designed. The example shows that this method can evaluate the supportability level of the radar equipment scientifically and effectively.

Key words: catastrophe progression method, radar equipment, supportability, evaluation, index system, unitary formula

中图分类号:

TN95
N945.1

施端阳, 胡冰, 陈嘉勋, 董兴阳. 改进突变级数法的雷达装备保障性评估模型[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(1): 89-94.

SHI Duan-yang, HU Bing, CHEN Jia-xun, DONG Xing-yang. Supportability Evaluation Model of Radar Equipment Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2020, 48(1): 89-94.

参考文献

[1] 杨秉喜.雷达综合技术保障工程[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2001:17.
YANG Bing-xi.Radar Integrated Technical Support Project[M].Beijing:China Standard Press,2001:17.
[2] 杨江平.雷达装备保障学[M].北京:蓝天出版社,2014:36-58.
YANG Jiang-ping.Radar Equipment Support Science[M].Beijing:Blue Sky Press,2014:36-58.
[3] 程杨,胡冰,董伟.SPA-AHM的雷达装备保障性评估[J].现代防御技术,2018,46(6):115-121.
CHENG Yang,HU Bing,DONG Wei.Supportability Evaluation of Radar Equipment Based on SPA-AHM[J].Modern Defence Technology,2018,46(6):115-121.
[4] 卢雷,杨江平,常春贺.基于集对分析的雷达装备保障性评估[J].现代防御技术,2013,41(1):142-146.
LU Lei,YANG Jiang-ping,CHANG Chun-he.Supportability Assessment of Radar Equipment Based on Set Pair Analysis[J].Modern Defence Technology,2013,41(1):142-146.
[5] 赵耀,翟长生,闫世强.新型雷达装备战斗力的模糊综合评价[J].空军雷达学院学报,2009,23(5):324-326.
ZHAO Yao,ZHAI Chang-sheng,YAN Shi-qiang.Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Battle Effectiveness of New-Type Radar Equipment[J].Journal of Air Force Radar Academy,2009,23(5):324-326.
[6] 彭飞,杨江平,钱建刚,等.雷达装备保障性评估模型[J].火力与指挥控制,2009,34(7):69-72.
PENG Fei,YANG Jiang-ping,QIAN Jian-gang,et al.Research on Evaluation Model of Radar Supportability[J].Fire Control & Command Control,2009,34(7):69-72.
[7] 王永杰.基于模糊灰色理论的雷达装备保障性评估[J].现代防御技术,2015,43(2):159-164.
WANG Yong-jie.Supportability Evaluation Method of Radar Based on Fuzzy Grey Theory[J].Modern Defence Technology,2015,43(2):159-164.
[8] 马亚龙,邵秋峰,孙明,等.评估理论和方法及其军事应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2013:132.
MA Ya-long,SHAO Qiu-feng,SUN Ming,et al.Theories and Methods of Evaluation and Their Military Applications[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2013:132.
[9] 施端阳,胡冰,张长聪.基于粗糙集的雷达装备保障性评估指标约简方法[J].空军预警学院学报,2019,33(2):107-111.
SHI Duan-yang,HU Bing,ZHANG Chang-cong.A Reduction Method for Index of Radar Equipment Supportability Evaluation Based on Rough Set[J].Journal of Air Force Early Warning Academy,2019,33(2):107-111.
[10] 谢宗仁,吕建伟,林华.基于突变级数法的舰船作战能力综合评价[J].中国舰船研究,2016,11(3):5-10.
XIE Zong-ren,LÜ Jian-wei,LIN Hua.The Comprehensive Evaluation of Naval Vessl′s Engagement Capability Based on the Catastrophe Progression Method[J].Chinese Journal of Ship Research,2016,11(3):5-10.
[11] 许秀娟.突变级数法在城市基础设施水平空间差异评价中的应用[J].工程管理学报,2018,32(6):81-86.
XU Xiu-juan.The Application of Catastrophe Progression Method in Assessing the Horizontal Spatial Difference of Urban Infrastructures[J].Journal of Engineering Management,2018,32(6):81-86.
[12] 邓长涛,严超君,董菁.基于突变理论的工业园区环境风险评价[J].陕西水利,2018(6):98-101.
DENG Chang-tao,YAN Chao-jun,DONG Jing.Environmental Risk Assessment of Industrial Park Area Based on Catastrophe Theory[J].Shaanxi Water Resources,2018(6):98-101.
[13] 夏国清,栾添添,孙明晓,等.基于主成分约简和突变级数的舰载机出动能力综合评估方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2018,40(2):330-337.
XIA Guo-qing,LUAN Tian-tian,SUN Ming-xiao,et al.Reduction and Catastrophe Progression Evaluation Method for Sortie Generation of Carrier Aircraft[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics,2018,40(2):330-337.
[14] 李绍飞,陈伏龙,余萍,等.平原区浅层地下水污染风险评价[J].武汉大学学报:工学版,2018,51(12):1035-1040.
LI Shao-fei,CHEN Fu-long,YU Ping,et al.Shallow Groundwater Pollution Risk Evaluation in Plain Areas[J].Journal of Wuhan University:Engineering ed,2018,51(12):1035-1040.
[15] 程杨,胡冰,董宇辉,等.基于Grey-AHM的雷达装备保障性评估[J].现代雷达,2019,41(1):9-13.
CHENG Yang,HU Bing,DONG Yu-hui,et al.Supportability Evaluation of Radar Equipment Based on Grey-AHM[J].Modern Radar,2019,41(1):9-13.

改进突变级数法的雷达装备保障性评估模型

Supportability Evaluation Model of Radar Equipment Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王斌, 王基策, 尚颖, 王晓菲, 温泉. 防空反导体系网络攻击效能评估与防御策略建议[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(3): 57-65.
[2]	陈美杉, 钱坤, 李玲杰, 刘赢. 基于ICRITIC-GCN的空战目标威胁评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(2): 1-13.
[3]	胡文华, 朱常安, 薛东方, 赵喜, 杨瑞. 雷达状态监测与性能综合评估系统的设计与实现[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(2): 133-140.
[4]	宋振之, 韩道文, 鲍俊臣, 黄朝阳. 基于改进ADC模型光电对抗系统作战效能评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(1): 26-34.
[5]	张耀龙, 阮拥军, 赵陆昊, 黄义松, 郭宇荣. 基于可拓云的合成旅装备保障能力评估方法研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(1): 86-95.
[6]	李迎博, 谭黎立, 王凯旋, 梁卓, 潘彦鹏. 一种基于构件重要度的软件可靠性评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(6): 103-109.
[7]	雷瑶, 赵建印, 白玉. 等级模糊条件下的导弹装备质量状态评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(6): 110-116.
[8]	王文涛, 甘旭升, 吴亚荣, 任谨慎, 王翠香. 考虑不确定性的低空无人机运行风险评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(5): 14-21.
[9]	刘思彤, 张占月, 刘达, 许益乔. 高超声速飞行器防御体系建设顶层构想[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 10-16.
[10]	赵庆媛, 叶春茂, 鲁耀兵. 基于随机森林的微动特征重要性评估研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 124-131.
[11]	刘丹丹, 唐毓燕, 原艳斌, 倪晓峰, 荆云建. 导弹装备健康管理系统的设计与应用[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 140-147.
[12]	翟芸, 胡冰, 施端阳. 基于改进AHP-熵权法的雷达装备可靠性评估指标赋权方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 148-155.
[13]	张嘉伟, 王闯, 刘少波. 防空导弹反舰自适应起爆控制策略研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 52-61.
[14]	李威, 卢盈齐. 基于聚类组合赋权的空袭目标威胁评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(3): 17-24.
[15]	刘勇, 周宏潮, 杨照, 徐琎. 基于攻防对抗序列的“饱和”能力评估方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(3): 97-102.