Modern Defense Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 48-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2026.02.004
• PAPERS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Menggao TAO1,2, Bingqie WANG1, Qingxin ZHANG2, Wenjie WEI2, Jide TANG2, Wensi HE1
Received:2025-02-18
Revised:2025-04-24
Online:2026-04-28
Published:2026-04-30
Contact:
Bingqie WANG
陶梦高1,2, 王冰切1, 张清鑫2, 魏文杰2, 唐纪德2, 何文思1
通讯作者:
王冰切
作者简介:陶梦高(1989-),男,湖北武汉人。工程师,博士生,研究方向为信息对抗作战指挥。
CLC Number:
Menggao TAO, Bingqie WANG, Qingxin ZHANG, Wenjie WEI, Jide TANG, Wensi HE. Threat Assessment of Penetrating Counter Air Platforms Based on Combination Weighting TOPSIS[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2026, 54(2): 48-60.
陶梦高, 王冰切, 张清鑫, 魏文杰, 唐纪德, 何文思. 基于组合赋权TOPSIS的穿透性制空平台威胁评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2026, 54(2): 48-60.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xdfyjs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2026.02.004
| n | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | 0 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.41 |
| — | 3.12 | 4.27 | 5.45 | 6.62 | 7.79 | 8.99 |
Table 1 Random indicator RI and corresponding critical eigenvalues λmax' for nth order matrices
| n | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | 0 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.41 |
| — | 3.12 | 4.27 | 5.45 | 6.62 | 7.79 | 8.99 |
| 弹药类型 | 额定射程/km | 战斗部类型 | 核弹爆炸当量/t | 装药量/kg | 最大飞行Ma数 | 是否隐身 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B61-12 | 80 | 核弹 | 300 | 0.3 | 否 | |
| GBU-32 | 75 | 破片 | 202 | 0.8 | 否 | |
| GBU-39 | 100 | 复合 | 90 | 1.4 | 否 | |
| GBU-53 | 110 | 复合 | 50 | 1.5 | 否 | |
| AIM-9X | 18 | 破片 | 4 | 3.0 | 否 | |
| AIM-120 | 100 | 破片 | 20 | 4.0 | 否 | |
| AGM-183A | 1 600 | 破片 | 68 | 10 | 否 | |
| AGM-158 | 900 | 侵彻 | 450 | 0.9 | 是 |
Table 2 Parameters of typical munitions mounted on PCA platforms
| 弹药类型 | 额定射程/km | 战斗部类型 | 核弹爆炸当量/t | 装药量/kg | 最大飞行Ma数 | 是否隐身 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B61-12 | 80 | 核弹 | 300 | 0.3 | 否 | |
| GBU-32 | 75 | 破片 | 202 | 0.8 | 否 | |
| GBU-39 | 100 | 复合 | 90 | 1.4 | 否 | |
| GBU-53 | 110 | 复合 | 50 | 1.5 | 否 | |
| AIM-9X | 18 | 破片 | 4 | 3.0 | 否 | |
| AIM-120 | 100 | 破片 | 20 | 4.0 | 否 | |
| AGM-183A | 1 600 | 破片 | 68 | 10 | 否 | |
| AGM-158 | 900 | 侵彻 | 450 | 0.9 | 是 |
| 弹药类型 | 最大射程 z1 | 毁伤能力z2 | 隐身能力z3 | 最大飞行 速度z4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B61-12 | 0.043 3 | 0.953 5 | 0 | 0.024 8 |
| GBU-32 | 0.040 6 | 0.064 2 | 0 | 0.066 2 |
| GBU-39 | 0.054 1 | 0.057 2 | 0 | 0.115 9 |
| GBU-53 | 0.059 5 | 0.031 8 | 0 | 0.124 2 |
| AIM-9X | 0.009 7 | 0.001 3 | 0 | 0.248 3 |
| AIM-120 | 0.054 1 | 0.006 4 | 0 | 0.331 1 |
| AGM-183A | 0.865 9 | 0.021 6 | 0 | 0.827 8 |
| AGM-158 | 0.487 1 | 0.286 1 | 1 | 0.331 1 |
Table 3 Decision matrix for ammunition weapon attack capability
| 弹药类型 | 最大射程 z1 | 毁伤能力z2 | 隐身能力z3 | 最大飞行 速度z4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B61-12 | 0.043 3 | 0.953 5 | 0 | 0.024 8 |
| GBU-32 | 0.040 6 | 0.064 2 | 0 | 0.066 2 |
| GBU-39 | 0.054 1 | 0.057 2 | 0 | 0.115 9 |
| GBU-53 | 0.059 5 | 0.031 8 | 0 | 0.124 2 |
| AIM-9X | 0.009 7 | 0.001 3 | 0 | 0.248 3 |
| AIM-120 | 0.054 1 | 0.006 4 | 0 | 0.331 1 |
| AGM-183A | 0.865 9 | 0.021 6 | 0 | 0.827 8 |
| AGM-158 | 0.487 1 | 0.286 1 | 1 | 0.331 1 |
| 弹药类型 | B-2 | B-1B | F-22A | F-35A | MQ-9 | B-52H | C-17 | E-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B61-12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| GBU-32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GBU-39 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GBU-53 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| AIM-9X | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIM-120 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| AGM-183A | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| AGM-158 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 4 Distribution scheme for the number of loaded munitions on PCA platforms
| 弹药类型 | B-2 | B-1B | F-22A | F-35A | MQ-9 | B-52H | C-17 | E-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B61-12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| GBU-32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GBU-39 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GBU-53 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| AIM-9X | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIM-120 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| AGM-183A | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| AGM-158 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PCA平台 | B-2 | B-1B | F-22A | F-35A | MQ-9 | B-52H | C-17 | E-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 火力打击效能 | 1.39 | 0.93 | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.14 | 3.49 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 Attribute values of weapon attack capabilities by PCA platforms
| PCA平台 | B-2 | B-1B | F-22A | F-35A | MQ-9 | B-52H | C-17 | E-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 火力打击效能 | 1.39 | 0.93 | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.14 | 3.49 | 0 | 0 |
PCA 平台 | 最大 平飞 Ma数 | 电磁 压制 效能 | RCS/ ㎡ | 雷达 最大可 跟踪 目标数 | 雷达 远距 探测范围/ km | 最大可用升力系数 | 满载时 总质量/ t | 机翼 面积/ ㎡ | 最大 静推力/ ×103N | 指控其他飞机的数量 | 最佳阵位距离/km | 共享 系数 | 红外 最大可 跟踪 目标数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 0.95 | 较弱 | <0.001 | 30 | 300 | 1.0 | 170.00 | 473.6 | 320 | 5 | 600 | 0.08 | 8 |
| B-1B | 1.18 | 无 | 0.75 | 20 | 200 | 1.5 | 216.36 | 180.6 | 532 | 5 | 600 | 0.07 | 7 |
| F-22A | 2.25 | 中等 | 0.02 | 20 | 200 | 2.0 | 37.77 | 78.0 | 311 | 10 | 100 | 0.09 | 15 |
| F-35A | 1.58 | 较强 | 0.05 | 16 | 150 | 1.9 | 31.75 | 42.7 | 191 | 10 | 100 | 0.09 | 13 |
| MQ-9 | 0.39 | 较强 | 1.20 | 10 | 87 | 0.5 | 4.75 | 16.2 | 4 | 2 | 50 | 0.06 | 6 |
| B-52H | 0.82 | 中等 | 100 | 10 | 300 | 1.0 | 219.57 | 371.6 | 612 | 3 | 1 000 | 0.06 | 2 |
| C-17 | 0.68 | 无 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 265.35 | 353.0 | 680 | 2 | 2 000 | 0.06 | 0 |
| E-3 | 0.76 | 无 | 20 | 55 | 600 | 0.4 | 151.53 | 283.4 | 381 | 14 | 600 | 0.09 | 20 |
Table 6 Performance parameters table of typical PCA platforms for penetrating counter air operations
PCA 平台 | 最大 平飞 Ma数 | 电磁 压制 效能 | RCS/ ㎡ | 雷达 最大可 跟踪 目标数 | 雷达 远距 探测范围/ km | 最大可用升力系数 | 满载时 总质量/ t | 机翼 面积/ ㎡ | 最大 静推力/ ×103N | 指控其他飞机的数量 | 最佳阵位距离/km | 共享 系数 | 红外 最大可 跟踪 目标数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 0.95 | 较弱 | <0.001 | 30 | 300 | 1.0 | 170.00 | 473.6 | 320 | 5 | 600 | 0.08 | 8 |
| B-1B | 1.18 | 无 | 0.75 | 20 | 200 | 1.5 | 216.36 | 180.6 | 532 | 5 | 600 | 0.07 | 7 |
| F-22A | 2.25 | 中等 | 0.02 | 20 | 200 | 2.0 | 37.77 | 78.0 | 311 | 10 | 100 | 0.09 | 15 |
| F-35A | 1.58 | 较强 | 0.05 | 16 | 150 | 1.9 | 31.75 | 42.7 | 191 | 10 | 100 | 0.09 | 13 |
| MQ-9 | 0.39 | 较强 | 1.20 | 10 | 87 | 0.5 | 4.75 | 16.2 | 4 | 2 | 50 | 0.06 | 6 |
| B-52H | 0.82 | 中等 | 100 | 10 | 300 | 1.0 | 219.57 | 371.6 | 612 | 3 | 1 000 | 0.06 | 2 |
| C-17 | 0.68 | 无 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 265.35 | 353.0 | 680 | 2 | 2 000 | 0.06 | 0 |
| E-3 | 0.76 | 无 | 20 | 55 | 600 | 0.4 | 151.53 | 283.4 | 381 | 14 | 600 | 0.09 | 20 |
PCA 平台 | 部署巡航 阶段/km | 穿透规避 阶段/km | 打击摧毁 阶段/km |
|---|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 1 000 | 800 | 500 |
| B-1B | 1 000 | 800 | 500 |
| F-22A | 800 | 500 | 110 |
| F-35A | 800 | 500 | 110 |
| MQ-9 | 600 | 300 | 55 |
| B-52H | 1 000 | 1 000 | 1 000 |
| C-17 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 |
| E-3 | 800 | 800 | 500 |
Table 7 Distance La of PCA platforms from struck targets in different phases
PCA 平台 | 部署巡航 阶段/km | 穿透规避 阶段/km | 打击摧毁 阶段/km |
|---|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 1 000 | 800 | 500 |
| B-1B | 1 000 | 800 | 500 |
| F-22A | 800 | 500 | 110 |
| F-35A | 800 | 500 | 110 |
| MQ-9 | 600 | 300 | 55 |
| B-52H | 1 000 | 1 000 | 1 000 |
| C-17 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 |
| E-3 | 800 | 800 | 500 |
| PCA平台 | 指挥控制 能力y1 | 电子干扰 能力y2 | 三维机动 响应值y3 | 最小投射 时间y4 | 隐身能力y5 | 态势感知 能力y6 | 武器攻击 能力y7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 160 | 0 | 1.55 | 2.58 | 1 | 7.80 | 1.39 |
| B-1B | 160 | 0 | 2.95 | 2.08 | 0.50 | 2.63 | 0.93 |
| F-22A | 500 | 0.5 | 3.32 | 0.54 | 0.75 | 19.92 | 0.24 |
| F-35A | 500 | 1 | 3.26 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 9.84 | 0.51 |
| MQ-9 | 13 | 1 | 0.88 | 1.26 | 0.25 | 1.38 | 0.14 |
| B-52H | 80 | 0.5 | 1.88 | 2.99 | 0 | 0.69 | 3.49 |
| C-17 | 53 | 0 | 1.81 | 21.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E-3 | 1 633 | 0 | 1.19 | 3.22 | 0 | 12.56 | 0 |
Table 8 Decision matrix for threat assessment of PCA platforms for anti-penetration operations in the strike and destroy phase
| PCA平台 | 指挥控制 能力y1 | 电子干扰 能力y2 | 三维机动 响应值y3 | 最小投射 时间y4 | 隐身能力y5 | 态势感知 能力y6 | 武器攻击 能力y7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 160 | 0 | 1.55 | 2.58 | 1 | 7.80 | 1.39 |
| B-1B | 160 | 0 | 2.95 | 2.08 | 0.50 | 2.63 | 0.93 |
| F-22A | 500 | 0.5 | 3.32 | 0.54 | 0.75 | 19.92 | 0.24 |
| F-35A | 500 | 1 | 3.26 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 9.84 | 0.51 |
| MQ-9 | 13 | 1 | 0.88 | 1.26 | 0.25 | 1.38 | 0.14 |
| B-52H | 80 | 0.5 | 1.88 | 2.99 | 0 | 0.69 | 3.49 |
| C-17 | 53 | 0 | 1.81 | 21.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E-3 | 1 633 | 0 | 1.19 | 3.22 | 0 | 12.56 | 0 |
| PCA平台 | 部署与巡航 阶段 | 穿透与规避 阶段 | 打击与摧毁 阶段 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 威胁度 | 排序 | 威胁度 | 排序 | 威胁度 | 排序 | |
| B-2 | 15.38 | 2 | 15.49 | 3 | 15.38 | 2 |
| B-1B | 8.41 | 7 | 8.22 | 7 | 9.86 | 6 |
| F-22A | 14.01 | 4 | 14.54 | 4 | 14.65 | 4 |
| F-35A | 15.29 | 3 | 15.73 | 2 | 15.10 | 3 |
| MQ-9 | 8.72 | 6 | 8.99 | 6 | 8.29 | 7 |
| B-52H | 17.91 | 1 | 17.79 | 1 | 17.55 | 1 |
| C-17 | 7.04 | 8 | 6.93 | 8 | 7.86 | 8 |
| E-3 | 13.23 | 5 | 12.32 | 5 | 11.31 | 5 |
Table 9 Results of threat assessment of PCA platforms for anti-penetration operations
| PCA平台 | 部署与巡航 阶段 | 穿透与规避 阶段 | 打击与摧毁 阶段 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 威胁度 | 排序 | 威胁度 | 排序 | 威胁度 | 排序 | |
| B-2 | 15.38 | 2 | 15.49 | 3 | 15.38 | 2 |
| B-1B | 8.41 | 7 | 8.22 | 7 | 9.86 | 6 |
| F-22A | 14.01 | 4 | 14.54 | 4 | 14.65 | 4 |
| F-35A | 15.29 | 3 | 15.73 | 2 | 15.10 | 3 |
| MQ-9 | 8.72 | 6 | 8.99 | 6 | 8.29 | 7 |
| B-52H | 17.91 | 1 | 17.79 | 1 | 17.55 | 1 |
| C-17 | 7.04 | 8 | 6.93 | 8 | 7.86 | 8 |
| E-3 | 13.23 | 5 | 12.32 | 5 | 11.31 | 5 |
PCA 平台 | 部署与巡航阶段排序 | 穿透与规避阶段排序 | 打击与摧毁阶段排序 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无核弹 | 有核弹 | 无核弹 | 有核弹 | 无核弹 | 有核弹 | |
| B-2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| B-1B | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| F-22A | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| F-35A | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| MQ-9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| B-52H | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| C-17 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| E-3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
Table 10 Results of threat assessment of PCA platforms for anti-penetration operations
PCA 平台 | 部署与巡航阶段排序 | 穿透与规避阶段排序 | 打击与摧毁阶段排序 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无核弹 | 有核弹 | 无核弹 | 有核弹 | 无核弹 | 有核弹 | |
| B-2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| B-1B | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| F-22A | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| F-35A | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| MQ-9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| B-52H | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| C-17 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| E-3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| [1] | WANG Yingyang, ZHANG Peng, GUO Jilian, et al. Coupled Funnel Control for Supersonic Tailless Aerial Vehicle on Penetrating Counter Air[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(7): 458-481. |
| [2] | 李坤. 美空军“穿透性制空”作战构想解析[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2022, 38(3): 55-58. |
| LI Kun. U.S. Air Force Penetrable Air Warfare Vision Resolution[J]. Aerospace Electronic Warfare, 2022, 38(3): 55-58. | |
| [3] | Enterprise Capability Collaboration Team(ECCT). Air Superiority 2030 Flight Plan: [R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Air Force, 2016. |
| [4] | 简久生, 薛炳迪, 冯顺平, 等. 浅析美军穿透性制空“系统簇”[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2023, 46(6): 15-20. |
| JIAN Jiusheng, XUE Bingdi, FENG Shunping, et al. Analysis of the Penetrating Counter Air “Family of Systems” of the U.S. Military[J]. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2023, 46(6): 15-20. | |
| [5] | JANES. United States Air Force Next Generation Air Dominance Platform[EB/OL]. [2025-01-20]. . |
| [6] | 王超磊, 樊会涛. 美军新型制空作战概念研究[J]. 航空兵器, 2022, 29(3): 8-13. |
| WANG Chaolei, FAN Huitao. Research on New Air Combat Concepts of US Military[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2022, 29(3): 8-13. | |
| [7] | 张佳琦, 曹毅. 穿透性制空作战建模仿真研究[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2022, 44(5): 112-116. |
| ZHANG Jiaqi, CAO Yi. Research on Modeling and Simulation Related to the Penetrating Counter Air[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2022, 44(5): 112-116. | |
| [8] | 朱宽宽. 空战威胁评估关键技术研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2021. |
| ZHU Kuankuan. Research on Key Technologies of Air Combat Threat Assessment[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2021. | |
| [9] | 杨远志, 周中良, 刘宏强, 等. 基于信息熵和粗糙集的空中目标威胁评估方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(10): 2071-2077. |
| YANG Yuanzhi, ZHOU Zhongliang, LIU Hongqiang, et al. Threat Evaluation Method of Air Target Based on Information Entropy and Rough Set[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(10): 2071-2077. | |
| [10] | 孔尚萍, 张海瑞, 廖选平, 等. 基于AHP与熵权法的空中目标威胁评估方法[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2018(1): 79-84. |
| KONG Shangping, ZHANG Hairui, LIAO Xuanping, et al. Aerial Targets Threat Assessment Based on AHP and Entropy Weight Method[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2018(1): 79-84. | |
| [11] | 郭佳. 基于多属性决策的空中目标威胁评估方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2017. |
| GUO Jia. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based Air-Targets Threat Assessment Methods[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017. | |
| [12] | 于晓野. 基于动态贝叶斯网络的空中目标威胁评估算法研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳理工大学, 2022. |
| YU Xiaoye. Air Target Threat Assessment Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network Algorithm Research[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Ligong University, 2022. | |
| [13] | 曾拥华, 王海燕, 武婷婷, 等. 基于组合赋权-TOPSIS的修理分队路线选择能力评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2024, 49(2): 161-165, 172. |
| ZENG Yonghua, WANG Haiyan, WU Tingting, et al. Evaluation of Route Selection Capability of Repair Teams Based on Combined Weighting and TOPSIS[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2024, 49(2): 161-165, 172. | |
| [14] | 牛军锋, 甘旭升, 刘影, 等. 空中目标威胁的ABC-RVM评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(4): 63-68, 74. |
| NIU Junfeng, GAN Xusheng, LIU Ying, et al. ABC-RVM Assessment Method for Air Target Threat[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(4): 63-68, 74. | |
| [15] | 杜挺, 谢贤健, 梁海艳, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS和GIS的重庆市县域经济综合评价及空间分析[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(6): 40-47. |
| DU Ting, XIE Xianjian, LIANG Haiyan, et al. County Economy Comprehensive Evaluation and Spatial Analysis in Chongqing City Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS and GIS[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(6): 40-47. | |
| [16] | AMANAT ULLAH A K M, MAHTAB M T, ALAM M G R. Efficient Portfolio Management Using TOPSIS and Ada-Boost[C]∥2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE). Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 1-6. |
| [17] | 黄天元, 汪顺生. 基于熵权法-AHP赋权的水利风景区科普能力评价[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2024(6): 94-98, 120. |
| HUANG Tianyuan, WANG Shunsheng. Evaluation of Science Popularization Capacity of Water Conservancy Scenic Spots Based on Entropy Weight Method-AHP Weighting[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2024(6): 94-98, 120. | |
| [18] | 刘超, 李川田, 武睿, 等. 基于熵权-模糊评价法的人员不安全行为风险研究[J]. 山西煤炭, 2024, 44(2): 48-53, 83. |
| LIU Chao, LI Chuantian, WU Rui, et al. Risk Research on Unsafe Behaviors Based on Entropy-Fuzzy Evaluation Method[J]. Shanxi Coal, 2024, 44(2): 48-53, 83. | |
| [19] | 李逸源, 杨江平, 费太勇, 等. 基于熵权法-云模型的雷达装备通用质量评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(5): 118-123, 129. |
| LI Yiyuan, YANG Jiangping, FEI Taiyong, et al. Evaluation of Radar General Quality Charactistic Based on Entropy Weight Method and Cloud Model[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(5): 118-123, 129. | |
| [20] | 岳超源. 决策理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003. |
| YUE Chaoyuan. Decision Theory and Method[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003. | |
| [21] | 魏群烁, 于澎. 美军“穿透性制空”作战概念的分析与应对[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2023, 39(2): 61-64. |
| WEI Qunshuo, YU Peng. Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineering. Analysis and Response to the “Penetrating Counter Air” Operational Concept of the US military[J]. Aerospace Electronic Warfare, 2023, 39(2): 61-64. | |
| [22] | 徐洪青. 基于网络信息体系的全域联合指挥与控制技术及未来展望[J]. 上海航天(中英文), 2024, 41(3): 1-8. |
| XU Hongqing. Joint All-Domain Command and Control Technology Based on Networked Information System and Its Future Perspectives[J]. Aerospace Shanghai(Chinese & English), 2024, 41(3): 1-8. | |
| [23] | 鲍俊臣, 韩道文, 程立, 等. 基于层次分析法的穿透性制空作战飞机威胁评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2024, 52(1): 8-15. |
| BAO Junchen, HAN Daowen, CHENG Li, et al. Threat Assessment of Penetrating Counterair Operational Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2024, 52(1): 8-15. | |
| [24] | 袁永龙, 李晓洁. 美军首枚B61-12核航弹完成组装即将启动全规模生产[J]. 国外核新闻, 2021(12): 16-18. |
| YUAN Yonglong, LI Xiaojie. The First B61-12 Nuclear Bomb of the US Military Has Been Assembled and Full-Scale Production Is About to Start[J]. Foreign Nuclear News, 2021(12): 16-18. | |
| [25] | 周晓峰, 杨建军, 王志勇. 美国小直径炸弹的发展概述和作战运用研究[J]. 飞航导弹, 2015(2): 47-50. |
| ZHOU Xiaofeng, YANG Jianjun, WANG Zhiyong. Research on the Development Overview and Operational Application of the Small Diameter Bomb of the United States[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2015(2): 47-50. | |
| [26] | 刘代军, 张蓬蓬. 美国下一代空空导弹发展历程与启示[J]. 航空兵器, 2016(2): 3-8. |
| LIU Daijun, ZHANG Pengpeng. Development and Revelation of US Next Generation Air-to-Air Missile[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2016(2): 3-8. | |
| [27] | WIBOWO S B, FAJAR M, NAUFAL W F, et al. Comparison of Aerodynamic Characteristics on Sukhoi SU-33-like and F-35 Lightning II-Like Models Using Water Tunnel Flow Visualization Technique[C]∥2019 5th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST). Piscataway: IEEE, 2019: 1-6. |
| [28] | SHEPPARD W A, JOHNSON A W, MILLER J O. Simulating F-22 Heavy Maintenance and Modifications Workforce Multi-skilling[C]∥Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014. Piscataway: IEEE, 2014: 2270-2279. |
| [29] | TOKARS R P, LEKKI J D. Self Diagnostic Accelerometer Ground Testing on a C-17 Aircraft Engine[C]∥Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2013: 1-8. |
| [30] | GILTS E E. A Simulation Approach to Address MQ-9 Flying Training Unit Manning Shortfalls[D]. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base: Air Force Institute of Technology, 2019. |
| [1] | Yu QIN, Hua CHAI, Fuyunxiang YANG, Zhen BAI. Deployment Optimization Method for High Power Microwave Anti-drone Swarm [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(6): 46-59. |
| [2] | Nan LIU. UAV Swarm Threat Assessment Method Based on Improved PROMETHEE [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(5): 92-98. |
| [3] | Qingtian ZHAO, Liwei LI, Yu ZHANG, Xin CHEN, Lizhi HOU, Zhen LEI. Assessment of Vulnerability in Intelligent Weapon Systems Based on Cloud Model [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(4): 64-73. |
| [4] | Hang HU, Pengcheng LIU, Yuchen ZHANG, Mei WANG. Risk Assessment of Network Defense System Using Combination Weighting Based on Game Theory [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(1): 88-96. |
| [5] | Yonghua ZENG, Haiyan WANG, Tingting WU, Xiaolong WANG, Baicun JIANG, Hengyuan LIANG. Evaluation of Contingent-Level Battlefield Repair Capability Based on Cloud Model [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(5): 116-126. |
| [6] | Xuegeng ZHU, Jialu LIU. A Review of Research on Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods in Target Threat Assessment [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(4): 89-100. |
| [7] | Junchen BAO, Daowen HAN, Li CHENG, Shuangyu WANG, Zhenzhi SONG. Threat Assessment of Penetrating Counterair Operational Aircraft Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(1): 8-15. |
| [8] | Futai LIANG, Yan ZHOU, Chenhao ZHANG, Zihao SONG, Xiaorui ZHAO. Threat Assessment Method of Aerial Targets under Confrontational Conditions [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(1): 147-154. |
| [9] | Kun WANG, Yuchen ZHANG, Shuqin DONG, Jiang WU. Cyberspace Defense Capability Assessment Based on TOPSIS-Grey Association Analysis [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(6): 97-104. |
| [10] | Meishan CHEN, Kun QIAN, Lingjie LI, Ying LIU. Target Threat Assessment of Air Combat Based on ICRITIC-GCN [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(2): 1-13. |
| [11] | Yun ZHAI, Bing HU, Duan-yang SHI. Reliability Evaluation Method of Radar Equipment Based on Improved AHP-Entropy Weight Method [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(4): 148-155. |
| [12] | Wei LI, Ying-qi LU. Threat Assessment Method of Air Attack Target Based on Clustering Combination Weighting [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(3): 17-24. |
| [13] | LI Hai-jun, XU Ting-xue. Missile Condition Evaluation and Decision Based on Improved Grey Relational Analysis with Combination Weighting [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2021, 49(4): 91-98. |
| [14] | WANG Mu-hong, XU Yu, CHEN Guo-sheng. Research on Target Threat Assessment of Amphibious Assault Ship to Air Self-Defense [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2020, 48(6): 67-73. |
| [15] | WANG Guang-hui, XU Guang-da, XIE Yu-peng, Lu Chao. UCAN Air Combat Threat Assessment Based on Interval Number Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2018, 46(6): 1-6. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||