Modern Defense Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 18-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2023.06.003
• AIR SPACE DEFENSE SYSTEM AND WEAPON • Previous Articles Next Articles
Weijun YU1,2, Zhaohui SHI1
Received:
2022-11-01
Revised:
2023-04-04
Online:
2023-12-28
Published:
2023-12-29
作者简介:
余伟军(1994-),男,陕西西安人。助工,硕士,研究方向为反导装备部署筹划研究。
CLC Number:
Weijun YU, Zhaohui SHI. Research on Rationality Evaluation of Anti-Missile Equipment Configuration[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(6): 18-25.
余伟军, 史朝辉. 反导装备配置合理性评估研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(6): 18-25.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xdfyjs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2023.06.003
要地编号 | 方案1 | 方案2 | … | 方案k |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | … | |||
2 | … | |||
︙ | ︙ | ︙ | ︙ | |
s | … |
Table 1 Evaluation combination of multiple deployment schemes relative to multiple locations
要地编号 | 方案1 | 方案2 | … | 方案k |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | … | |||
2 | … | |||
︙ | ︙ | ︙ | ︙ | |
s | … |
要地编号 | 方案1 | 方案2 | 方案3 | 方案4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.95 | 0.14 | 0.79 | 1.35 |
2 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.90 | 0.12 |
3 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.54 | 0.65 |
Table 2 Evaluation value of multiple deployment schemes relative to multiple locations
要地编号 | 方案1 | 方案2 | 方案3 | 方案4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.95 | 0.14 | 0.79 | 1.35 |
2 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.90 | 0.12 |
3 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.54 | 0.65 |
要地编号 | 方案1 | 方案2 | 方案3 | 方案4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.703 7 | 0.103 7 | 0.585 2 | 1.000 0 |
2 | 0.355 6 | 0.311 1 | 0.666 7 | 0.088 9 |
3 | 0.592 6 | 0.681 5 | 0.400 0 | 0.481 5 |
Table 3 Evaluation value after normalized treatment
要地编号 | 方案1 | 方案2 | 方案3 | 方案4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.703 7 | 0.103 7 | 0.585 2 | 1.000 0 |
2 | 0.355 6 | 0.311 1 | 0.666 7 | 0.088 9 |
3 | 0.592 6 | 0.681 5 | 0.400 0 | 0.481 5 |
量化值 | |
---|---|
同等重要 | 1 |
稍微重要 | 3 |
较强重要 | 5 |
强烈重要 | 7 |
极端重要 | 9 |
两相邻判断中间值 | 2,4,6,8 |
反向比较 | 倒数 |
Table 4 Judgement matrix scale
量化值 | |
---|---|
同等重要 | 1 |
稍微重要 | 3 |
较强重要 | 5 |
强烈重要 | 7 |
极端重要 | 9 |
两相邻判断中间值 | 2,4,6,8 |
反向比较 | 倒数 |
维数 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RI | 0 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.41 | 1.45 |
Table 5 Judgment matrix random index RI
维数 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RI | 0 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.41 | 1.45 |
多层反导部署的配合协调性a1 | 交通地形等因素a4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | 方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | |
方案X | 1 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/3 | 5 |
方案Y | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
方案Z | 2 | 1/3 | 1 | 1/5 | 1/7 | 1 |
所有弹道拦截概率、毁伤概率a2 | 部署费用a5 | |||||
方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | 方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | |
方案X | 1 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
方案Y | 4 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
方案Z | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1/7 | 1/7 | 1 |
被掩护要地的重要性a3 | 生存能力a6 | |||||
方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | 方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | |
方案X | 1 | 3 | 1/3 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
方案Y | 1/3 | 1 | 1/5 | 1/7 | 1 | 2 |
方案Z | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1/9 | 1/2 | 1 |
Table 6 Judgment matrix of six evaluation indexes
多层反导部署的配合协调性a1 | 交通地形等因素a4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | 方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | |
方案X | 1 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/3 | 5 |
方案Y | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
方案Z | 2 | 1/3 | 1 | 1/5 | 1/7 | 1 |
所有弹道拦截概率、毁伤概率a2 | 部署费用a5 | |||||
方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | 方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | |
方案X | 1 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
方案Y | 4 | 1 | 1/2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
方案Z | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1/7 | 1/7 | 1 |
被掩护要地的重要性a3 | 生存能力a6 | |||||
方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | 方案X | 方案Y | 方案Z | |
方案X | 1 | 3 | 1/3 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
方案Y | 1/3 | 1 | 1/5 | 1/7 | 1 | 2 |
方案Z | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1/9 | 1/2 | 1 |
多层反导部署的配合协调性a1 | 所有弹道拦截概率、毁伤概率a2 | 被掩护要地的重要性a3 | 交通地形等因素a4 | 部署费用a5 | 生存能力a6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.019 3 | 3.025 8 | 3.032 8 | 3.065 1 | 3 | 3.021 3 |
Table 7 Maximum eigenvalues of six judgment matrices
多层反导部署的配合协调性a1 | 所有弹道拦截概率、毁伤概率a2 | 被掩护要地的重要性a3 | 交通地形等因素a4 | 部署费用a5 | 生存能力a6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.019 3 | 3.025 8 | 3.032 8 | 3.065 1 | 3 | 3.021 3 |
方案 | 多层反导部署的配合协调性a1 | 所有弹道拦截概率、毁伤概率a2 | 被掩护要地的重要性a3 | 交通地形等因素a4 | 部署费用a5 | 生存能力a6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X | 0.136 5 | 0.097 4 | 0.258 3 | 0.279 0 | 0.467 7 | 0.792 8 |
Y | 0.625 0 | 0.333 1 | 0.104 7 | 0.649 1 | 0.467 7 | 0.131 2 |
Z | 0.238 5 | 0.569 5 | 0.637 0 | 0.071 9 | 0.066 7 | 0.076 0 |
Table 8 Judgment matrix of eigenvectors
方案 | 多层反导部署的配合协调性a1 | 所有弹道拦截概率、毁伤概率a2 | 被掩护要地的重要性a3 | 交通地形等因素a4 | 部署费用a5 | 生存能力a6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X | 0.136 5 | 0.097 4 | 0.258 3 | 0.279 0 | 0.467 7 | 0.792 8 |
Y | 0.625 0 | 0.333 1 | 0.104 7 | 0.649 1 | 0.467 7 | 0.131 2 |
Z | 0.238 5 | 0.569 5 | 0.637 0 | 0.071 9 | 0.066 7 | 0.076 0 |
1 | 中国人民解放军军事科学院. 中国人民解放军军语[M]. 北京: 解放军战士出版社, 1982. |
Academy of Military Sciences of the People's Liberation Army. Military Language of the People's Liberation Army[M]. Beijing: PLA Warrior Publishing House, 1982. | |
2 | 刘健, 罗亮. 高层反导部署方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37(9): 85-88. |
LIU Jian, LUO Liang. Study on Disposition Method for High-altitude Anti-missile System[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2012, 37(9): 85-88. | |
3 | 王成思, 刘明阳, 宋晋敏. 末段反导武器配系部署规划研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2015, 43(6): 87-92. |
WANG Chengsi, LIU Mingyang, SONG Jinmin. Optimal Deploy of Terminal Segment Missile Defense Weapon[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2015, 43(6): 87-92. | |
4 | 黄仁全, 李为民, 田原, 等. 末段高低两层协同反导火力分配模型研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2010, 38(4): 26-30. |
HUANG Renquan, LI Weimin, TIAN Yuan, et al. Research on the Firepower Distribution Model of the Upper Layer Cooperate with Lower Layer for Missile Defense[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2010, 38(4): 26-30. | |
5 | 蹇成刚, 陈峰, 岳旭斌. 海基反导资源部署及作战能力SEM评估[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2018, 9(5): 74-79. |
JIAN Chenggang, CHEN Feng, YUE Xubin. Sea-Based BMD Resource Deployment and Combat Capability Estimation with SEM[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2018, 9(5): 74-79. | |
6 | 刘瑶, 张占月, 黄梓宸, 等. 点目标防御武器配系部署规划[J]. 现代防御技术, 2018, 46(5): 52-61. |
LIU Yao, ZHANG Zhanyue, HUANG Zichen, et al. Optimal Deployment of Defense Weapons Under Point Defense[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2018, 46(5): 52-61. | |
7 | 刘瑶, 张占月, 王磊. 中段反导火力单元优化部署研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(5): 157-161. |
LIU Yao, ZHANG Zhanyue, WANG Lei. Deployment and Optimization of Midcourse Anti-missile Firepower Unit[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43(5): 157-161. | |
8 | 季军亮, 汪民乐, 魏桥, 等. 多层反导协同作战有关问题及解决思路分析[J]. 飞航导弹, 2021(4): 68-73, 79. |
JI Junliang, WANG Minle, WEI Qiao, et al. Analysis on Problems and Solutions of Multi-layer Anti-missile Cooperative Operation[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2021(4): 68-73, 79. | |
9 | 何琳. 关于评估合理性的探讨[J]. 科研管理, 1995, 16(1): 45-48. |
HE Lin. Discussion on the Rationality of Evaluation[J]. Science Research Management, 1995, 16(1): 45-48. | |
10 | 刘健. 反TBM作战部署评估方法[J]. 航天控制, 2002, 20(4): 64-68, 81. |
LIU Jian. A Methodof Evaluating Anti-TBM Disposition[J]. Aerospace Control, 2002, 20(4): 64-68, 81. | |
11 | 徐兴平, 刘健, 田振浩. 基于云模型的濒海地区地面防空作战部署评价方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(1): 89-93. |
XU Xingping, LIU Jian, TIAN Zhenhao. Evaluation of Disposition Schemes for Ground Air-Defense Operation in Coastal Area Based on Cloud Model[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43(1): 89-93. | |
12 | 杨利平, 王颖龙, 谢磊峰. 多属性决策在防空作战部署方案评估中的应用[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2009, 34(5): 72-74. |
YANG Liping, WANG Yinglong, XIE Leifeng. Study on the Application of MADM to Scheme Assessment for Air Defense Combat Disposition[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2009, 34(5): 72-74. | |
13 | 潘泽东, 刘付显. 多属性决策的野战防空作战部署方案评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2018, 46(1): 115-119. |
PAN Zedong, LIU Fuxian. Evaluation of Deployment Plan of Field Air Defense Combat with Multi Attribute Decision Making[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2018, 46(1): 115-119. | |
14 | 郭蓬松, 龙光正, 赵博, 等. 地面防空作战部署评估仿真系统设计与实现[J]. 现代防御技术, 2014, 42(6): 153-159. |
GUO Pengsong, LONG Guangzheng, ZHAO Bo, et al. Design and Implementation of Simulation System on Evaluation of Ground to Air Defense Disposition[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2014, 42(6): 153-159. | |
15 | 刘健. 权重不确定时防空作战部署方案优选方法[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2004, 24(增3): 249-251. |
LIU Jian. A Method of Selecting Optimal Operational Disposition Scheme of Air Defence on Uncertain Weighting Coefficients Circumstances[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2004, 24(S3): 249-251. | |
16 | 刘健. 地面防空作战部署方案优选与改进方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2005, 30(2): 97-99. |
LIU Jian. Optimum Selection and Improvement of Disposition Schemes for Ground Air-Defence Operation[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2005, 30(2): 97-99. | |
17 | 张先剑, 徐昕. 防空反导机理分析及筹划决策[J]. 国防科技, 2022, 43(1): 7-13. |
ZHANG Xianjian, XU Xin. Air and Anti-missile Defenses: Mechanism Analysis and Decision-Making[J]. National Defense Technology, 2022, 43(1): 7-13. | |
18 | 季军亮, 汪民乐, 韩慧华, 等. AHP法在末段高层反导阵地防空方案选择中的应用[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2019, 44(4): 126-130. |
JI Junliang, WANG Minle, HAN Huihua, et al. Application of AHP Method for Top End of Anti Missile System Positions Air Defense[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2019, 44(4): 126-130. | |
19 | 刘硕, 刘芸江, 李曼, 等. 基于层次分析法的短波地空网链路优选算法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(1): 22-26, 31. |
LIU Shuo, LIU Yunjiang, LI Man, et al. Optimization Link Algorithm of High Frequency Ground-to-Air Network Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43(1): 22-26, 31. |
[1] | Guodong YUAN, Ming HE, Wei HAN, Minggang YU, Mingyang CHENG. Research on Resilience Reconstruction of Community Network of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Swarm [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(5): 50-58. |
[2] | Duanyang SHI, Qiang LIN, Bing HU, Jiajun CHEN. Performance Evaluation of Intelligent Radar Information Processing Based on Improved AHM-TOPSIS [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(5): 93-103. |
[3] | Bin WANG, Jice WANG, Ying SHANG, Xiaofei WANG, Quan WEN. Effectiveness Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Network Attacks of Air and Missile Defense System [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(3): 57-65. |
[4] | Wenhua HU, Changan ZHU, Dongfang XUE, Xi ZHAO, Rui YANG. Design and Implementation of Radar Condition Monitoring and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation System [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(2): 133-140. |
[5] | Guoliang LIU, Gangling JIAO, Ying MA, Jie HU, Weijiang SHI. Study on Safety Test Method of Ammunition [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(1): 107-118. |
[6] | Zhenzhi SONG, Daowen HAN, Junchen BAO, Chaoyan HUANG. Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Method Based on Improved ADC Model of Electro-Optic Countermeasure System [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(1): 26-34. |
[7] | Yaolong ZHANG, Yongjun RUAN, Luhao ZHAO, Yisong HUANG, Yurong GUO. Research on Equipment Support Capability Evaluation Method of Synthetic Brigade Based on Extension Cloud [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(1): 86-95. |
[8] | Ying-bo LI, Li-li TAN, Kai-xuan WANG, Zhuo LIANG, Yan-peng PAN. Software Reliability Evaluation Method Based on Component Importance [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(6): 103-109. |
[9] | Yao LEI, Jian-yin ZHAO, Yu BAI. Missile Equipment Quality Condition Assessment Under Fuzzy Evaluation Grade [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(6): 110-116. |
[10] | Si-tong LIU, Zhan-yue ZHANG, Da LIU, Yi-qiao XU. Top-Level Conception of Hypersonic Vehicle Defense System Construction [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(4): 10-16. |
[11] | Qing-yuan ZHAO, Chun-mao YE, Yao-bing LU. A Micro-Motion Feature Importance Evaluation Algorithm Based on Random Forest [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(4): 124-131. |
[12] | Wei LI, Ying-qi LU. Threat Assessment Method of Air Attack Target Based on Clustering Combination Weighting [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(3): 17-24. |
[13] | Yong LIU, Hong-chao ZHOU, Zhao YANG, Jin XU. Evaluation Method of Missile Saturation Ability Based on Attack-Defense Countering Sequence [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(3): 97-102. |
[14] | Li-xing ZHAO, Xing-ming HOU, Zhao-wen XU, Lin-zi HE. Evaluation of Test Equipment Maintenance Ability Based on GA-Wavelet-BP Neural Network [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(2): 84-95. |
[15] | Min DU, Zhong-hua CHENG, En-zhi DONG. Summary of Equipment System Contribution Rate Evaluation [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2022, 50(1): 7-18. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||