Modern Defense Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 130-140.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2026.04.014
• PAPERS • Previous Articles
Hao HUANG, Ning ZHANG, Zhigang WANG
Received:2025-06-12
Revised:2025-06-27
Online:2026-08-28
Published:2026-09-01
作者简介:黄浩(2001-),男,江苏南京人。硕士生,研究方向为雷达信号处理。
CLC Number:
Hao HUANG, Ning ZHANG, Zhigang WANG. A Radar Detection Method for Low-Altitude Cluster Targets Based on Multi-feature Fusion[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2026, 54(4): 130-140.
黄浩, 张宁, 王志刚. 基于多特征融合的集群雷达目标检测方法[J]. 现代防御技术, 2026, 54(4): 130-140.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xdfyjs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2026.04.014
| 中心频率/Hz | 脉冲重复频率/Hz | 脉冲宽度/ s | 脉冲数 | 采样率/ Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.35×109 | 1 000 | 1×10-5 | 128 | 60×106 |
Table 1 Radar parameters
| 中心频率/Hz | 脉冲重复频率/Hz | 脉冲宽度/ s | 脉冲数 | 采样率/ Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.35×109 | 1 000 | 1×10-5 | 128 | 60×106 |
| 检测率 | 召回率 | F1 | 虚警率 | 漏检率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.999 2 | 0.963 2 | 0.980 9 | 0.003 2 | 0.036 8 |
Table 2 Detection performance of GCAB-MFF network
| 检测率 | 召回率 | F1 | 虚警率 | 漏检率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.999 2 | 0.963 2 | 0.980 9 | 0.003 2 | 0.036 8 |
| 规模分类 | 分类精度 | 召回率 | F1 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无目标 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 316 |
| 单目标 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 307 |
| 小型集群 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 288 |
| 中型集群 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 345 |
| 大型集群 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 319 |
| 加权平均 | 0.925 6 | 0.926 0 | 0.926 1 | 1 575 |
Table 3 Classification performance of GCAB-MFF network
| 规模分类 | 分类精度 | 召回率 | F1 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无目标 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 316 |
| 单目标 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 307 |
| 小型集群 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 288 |
| 中型集群 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 345 |
| 大型集群 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 319 |
| 加权平均 | 0.925 6 | 0.926 0 | 0.926 1 | 1 575 |
| 通道 | 检测率 | 虚警率 | 分类精度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCAB-MFF | 0.999 2 | 0.003 2 | 0.925 6 |
| 通道1 | 0.849 4 | 0.016 7 | 0.819 1 |
| 通道2 | 0.854 9 | 0.013 0 | 0.798 0 |
Table 4 Comparison of detection performance of different channels
| 通道 | 检测率 | 虚警率 | 分类精度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCAB-MFF | 0.999 2 | 0.003 2 | 0.925 6 |
| 通道1 | 0.849 4 | 0.016 7 | 0.819 1 |
| 通道2 | 0.854 9 | 0.013 0 | 0.798 0 |
| 检测方法 | 检测率 | 虚警率 |
|---|---|---|
| GCAB-MFF | 0.999 2 | 0.003 2 |
| CA-CFAR | 0.771 9 | 0.012 3 |
| GO-CFAR | 0.859 6 | 0.072 0 |
| OS-CFAR | 0.824 5 | 0.025 5 |
| SOCA-CFAR | 0.894 7 | 0.014 6 |
| VG+GCN | 0.902 5 | 0.014 0 |
| 多尺度特征融合 | 0.899 0 | 0.018 9 |
| DCNN+DPA | 0.942 6 | 0.007 7 |
Table 5 Comparison of detection accuracy of different methods
| 检测方法 | 检测率 | 虚警率 |
|---|---|---|
| GCAB-MFF | 0.999 2 | 0.003 2 |
| CA-CFAR | 0.771 9 | 0.012 3 |
| GO-CFAR | 0.859 6 | 0.072 0 |
| OS-CFAR | 0.824 5 | 0.025 5 |
| SOCA-CFAR | 0.894 7 | 0.014 6 |
| VG+GCN | 0.902 5 | 0.014 0 |
| 多尺度特征融合 | 0.899 0 | 0.018 9 |
| DCNN+DPA | 0.942 6 | 0.007 7 |
| 分类器 | 分类精度 | 召回率 | F1 | 参数量×10-6 | FLOPs×10-9 | 推理时间/ms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCAB-MFF | 0.925 6 | 0.926 0 | 0.926 1 | 1.113 0 | 7.306 0 | 11.561 0 |
| ResNet18 | 0.858 9 | 0.788 0 | 0.860 0 | 11.690 0 | 9.529 0 | 2.121 0 |
| ResNet50 | 0.840 1 | 0.764 0 | 0.774 0 | 25.557 0 | 21.594 0 | 6.228 0 |
| EfficientNet-B3 | 0.849 8 | 0.817 7 | 0.850 0 | 12.146 0 | 5.026 0 | 5.943 0 |
Table 6 Performance comparison of different classifiers
| 分类器 | 分类精度 | 召回率 | F1 | 参数量×10-6 | FLOPs×10-9 | 推理时间/ms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCAB-MFF | 0.925 6 | 0.926 0 | 0.926 1 | 1.113 0 | 7.306 0 | 11.561 0 |
| ResNet18 | 0.858 9 | 0.788 0 | 0.860 0 | 11.690 0 | 9.529 0 | 2.121 0 |
| ResNet50 | 0.840 1 | 0.764 0 | 0.774 0 | 25.557 0 | 21.594 0 | 6.228 0 |
| EfficientNet-B3 | 0.849 8 | 0.817 7 | 0.850 0 | 12.146 0 | 5.026 0 | 5.943 0 |
| GCAF | BiFPN | CBAM | 检测率 | 虚警率 | 分类精度 | mAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | 0.912 1 | 0.093 4 | 0.821 9 | 0.770 8 |
| √ | - | - | 0.996 5 | 0.012 4 | 0.814 2 | 0.725 2 |
| - | √ | - | 0.981 1 | 0.033 4 | 0.874 7 | 0.763 6 |
| - | - | √ | 0.977 3 | 0.082 6 | 0.857 8 | 0.789 4 |
| √ | √ | - | 0.997 7 | 0.008 3 | 0.856 0 | 0.730 8 |
| - | √ | √ | 0.984 0 | 0.057 9 | 0.871 1 | 0.788 7 |
| √ | - | √ | 0.996 5 | 0.012 4 | 0.900 4 | 0.791 6 |
| √ | √ | √ | 0.999 2 | 0.003 2 | 0.925 6 | 0.810 9 |
Table 7 Performance comparison of ablation experiments
| GCAF | BiFPN | CBAM | 检测率 | 虚警率 | 分类精度 | mAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | 0.912 1 | 0.093 4 | 0.821 9 | 0.770 8 |
| √ | - | - | 0.996 5 | 0.012 4 | 0.814 2 | 0.725 2 |
| - | √ | - | 0.981 1 | 0.033 4 | 0.874 7 | 0.763 6 |
| - | - | √ | 0.977 3 | 0.082 6 | 0.857 8 | 0.789 4 |
| √ | √ | - | 0.997 7 | 0.008 3 | 0.856 0 | 0.730 8 |
| - | √ | √ | 0.984 0 | 0.057 9 | 0.871 1 | 0.788 7 |
| √ | - | √ | 0.996 5 | 0.012 4 | 0.900 4 | 0.791 6 |
| √ | √ | √ | 0.999 2 | 0.003 2 | 0.925 6 | 0.810 9 |
| [1] | FINN H M. Adaptive Detection in Clutter[C]∥Fifth Symposium on Adaptive Processes. Piscataway: IEEE, 1966: 562-567. |
| [2] | WANG Weijiang, WANG Runyi, JIANG Rongkun, et al. Modified Reference Window for Two-Dimensional CFAR in Radar Target Detection[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019(21): 7924-7927. |
| [3] | HANSEN V G, SAWYERS J H. Detectability Loss Due to “Greatest of” Selection in a Cell-Averaging CFAR[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1980, 16(1): 115-118. |
| [4] | TRUNK G V. Range Resolution of Targets Using Automatic Detectors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1978, 14(5): 750-755. |
| [5] | ROHLING H. Radar CFAR Thresholding in Clutter and Multiple Target Situations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1983, 19(4): 608-621. |
| [6] | SMITH M E, VARSHNEY P K. Intelligent CFAR Processor Based on Data Variability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2000, 36(3): 837-847. |
| [7] | LEUNG T L H, LITVA J, HAYKIN S, et al. Fractal Characterisation of Sea-Scattered Signals and Detection of Sea-Surface Targets[J]. IEE Proceedings F (Radar and Signal Processing), 1993, 140(4): 243-250. |
| [8] | SHUI Penglang, LI Dongchen, XU Shuwen. Tri-Feature-Based Detection of Floating Small Targets in Sea Clutter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2014, 50(2): 1416-1430. |
| [9] | 时艳玲, 姚婷婷, 郭亚星. 基于图连通密度的海面漂浮小目标检测[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(11): 3185-3192. |
| SHI Yanling, YAO Tingting, GUO Yaxing. Floating Small Target Detection Based on Graph Connected Density in Sea Surface[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(11): 3185-3192. | |
| [10] | 潘明海. 雷达天线波束内群目标的超分辨率检测与参量估值[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2000. |
| PAN Haiming. Super-Resolution Detection and Parameter Estimation of Group Targets in Radar Antenna Beam[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2000. | |
| [11] | WILLETT P K, BLAIR W D, OGLE T L, et al. Comparison of Methods for Tracking Separating Targets with a Monopulse Radar[C]∥Proceedings Volume 5204, Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 2003. Bellingham: SPIE, 2004: 118-130. |
| [12] | HUGHES P K. A High-Resolution Radar Detection Strategy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1983, 19(5): 663-667. |
| [13] | 徐松涛, 杨绍全. 被动单脉冲导引头干扰源角度分辨[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2004, 31(1): 102-105, 109. |
| XU Songtao, YANG Shaoquan. Angular Resolution of Jammers of the Passive Monopulse Seeker[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2004, 31(1): 102-105, 109. | |
| [14] | 戴奉周, 刘宏伟, 吴顺君. 一种基于顺序统计量的距离扩展目标检测器[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2009, 31(10): 2488-2492. |
| DAI Fengzhou, LIU Hongwei, WU Shunjun. Order-Statistic-Based Detector for Range Spread Target[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2009, 31(10): 2488-2492. | |
| [15] | CHEN Simin, FENG Chen, HUANG Yong, et al. Small Target Detection in X-Band Sea Clutter Using the Visibility Graph[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 1-11. |
| [16] | 王宁, 胡哲, 周兴杰, 等. 基于多尺度特征融合的雷达海上目标检测方法[J]. 电子设计工程, 2024, 32(6): 118-121, 126. |
| WANG Ning, HU Zhe, ZHOU Xingjie, et al. Radar Maritime Target Detection Method Based on Multi-scale Feature Fusion[J]. Electronic Design Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 118-121, 126. | |
| [17] | WANG Jingang, LI Songbin. Maritime Radar Target Detection in Sea Clutter Based on CNN With Dual-Perspective Attention[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2023, 20: 1-5. |
| [18] | WARD K D, WATTS S, TOUGH R J A. Sea Clutter: Scattering, the K Distribution and Radar Performance[M]. London: IET, 2006. |
| [19] | PEI Bingnan, BAO Zheng. Multi-Aspect Radar Target Recognition Method Based on Scattering Centers and HMMs Classifiers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2005, 41(3): 1067-1074. |
| [20] | 王殿勋, 郭萃, 谢君, 等. 无人机集群对海上舰船的作战样式研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(10): 1-9. |
| WANG Dianxun, GUO Cui, XIE Jun, et al. Research on Combat Style of Air UAV Cluster Against Maritime Ships[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(10): 1-9. |
| [1] | Yongliang HE, Zhenyu GAO, Hui TANG, Chen FEI. Research on Unexploded Ordnance Disposal Technology Based on Drone in Low Altitude Environment [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2026, 54(3): 50-59. |
| [2] | Zhiqiang ZHANG, Jin HU, Jinxin XU, Yunsong WU. Specific Emitter Identification Algorithm Based on Sample Alignment and Semi-global Attention Mechanism [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2026, 54(2): 128-136. |
| [3] | Yunsong WU, Wei CAO, Jife PAN, Jinxin XU, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Linfeng JI. Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Active and Passive Data Synergy [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2026, 54(1): 111-118. |
| [4] | Quanyin HUANG, Yichao CAI, Hao LI, Weihua WU, Chenyang WANG. Improved UKF Universal Target Tracking Algorithm Based on GRU Prediction [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(6): 134-148. |
| [5] | Haiyan ZHAO, Feng ZHOU, Wenjing YANG, Di LIU, Tianyuan YANG. Research on Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Anti-missile Equipment System Based on GWO-DBN [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(2): 45-54. |
| [6] | Wendong ZHAO, Mingzhi ZHANG, Shengming GUO. A Method of Target Group Type Identification Oriented System Combat [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(2): 74-81. |
| [7] | Jiakuan LI, Bo FENG, Lunhao SHEN, Chunmao YE, Jizhou YU. Aerodynamic Target Recognition Method Based on Incidence Angle-Guided Radar Image Feature Fusion [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(2): 129-140. |
| [8] | Huiyuan XING, Yaqi CUI, Ziling WANG, Wei XIONG, Bingdong JIANG. Target Detection Algorithm for Ships at Sea Under Complex Sea Conditions [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(6): 88-96. |
| [9] | Liping YANG, Qiqing FANG, Yahui HU, Chenggang GU, Huimin WANG. Research on Knowledge Graph Construction Method of Early Warning Equipment Based on Deep Learning [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(5): 61-72. |
| [10] | Henglei XU, Shuaiqi CHEN, Xun SONG, Mingjie ZHU. Blade Stitching Technology Based on Image Semantic Segmentation and Structure Preservation Constraints [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(4): 123-129. |
| [11] | Yongjun TU, Hongsheng LIN, Zhiyong WANG. Underwater Image Background and Foreground Segmentation Method with Parallel Convolution [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(3): 104-111. |
| [12] | Wendong ZHAO, Mingzhi ZHANG, Shengming GUO. Operational Action Identification Method from Knowledge Association Perspective [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2024, 52(3): 64-72. |
| [13] | Yang LI, Xiao LIANG, Haisa JIA. Ship Detection in SAR Images Based on Knowledge Distillation [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(4): 78-85. |
| [14] | Zhe LI, Yiqi TONG, Wenbo XIA, Yuxin YING. A Multi-source Centralized Air Target Classification Method [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(4): 53-62. |
| [15] | Ming HE, Zihan ZHU, Xulong ZHAI, Zheng ZHAI, Chengpeng HAO. Air-to-Ground Target Detection Algorithm Based on Multi-branch Context Fusion [J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2023, 51(3): 91-98. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||